Current:Home > ContactFederal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas -NextFrontier Finance
Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
View
Date:2025-04-25 19:37:08
A federal court on Wednesday affirmed a federal judge’s 2021 ruling imposing a $14.25 million penalty on Exxon Mobil for thousands of violations of the federal Clean Air Act at the company’s refinery and chemical plant complex in Baytown.
The decision by a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejects Exxon’s latest appeal, closing over a decade of litigation since the Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued the company in 2010.
“This ruling affirms a bedrock principle of constitutional law that people who live near pollution-spewing industrial facilities have a personal stake in holding polluters accountable for non-compliance with federal air pollution limits, and therefore have a right to sue to enforce the Clean Air Act as Congress intended,” Josh Kratka, managing attorney at the National Environmental Law Center and a lead lawyer on the case, said in a statement.
From 2005 to 2013, a federal judge found in 2017, Exxon’s refinery and chemical plants in Baytown released 10 million pounds of pollution beyond its state-issued air permits, including carcinogenic and toxic chemicals. U.S. District Judge David Hittner ordered Exxon to pay $19.95 million as punishment for exceeding air pollution limits on 16,386 days.
“We’re disappointed in this decision and considering other legal options,” an Exxon spokesperson said in response to the ruling.
Baytown sits 25 miles outside of Houston, with tens of thousands of people living near Exxon’s facility.
Exxon appealed and asked Hittner to re-examine how the fine was calculated, including by considering how much money the company saved by delaying repairs that would’ve prevented the excess air emissions in the first place. The company also argued that it had presented sufficient evidence to show that emissions were unavoidable.
In 2021, Hittner reduced the fine to $14.25 million — the largest penalty imposed by a court out of a citizen-initiated lawsuit under the Clean Air Act, according to Environment Texas. Exxon appealed again, challenging the plaintiffs’ standing to bring the lawsuit.
While a majority of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed Hittner’s 2021 decision on Wednesday, seven members of the 17-judge panel also said they would have upheld the $19.95 million fine.
“The principal issue before the en banc Court is whether Plaintiffs’ members, who live, work, and recreate near Exxon’s facility, have a sufficient ‘personal stake’ in curtailing Exxon’s ongoing and future unlawful emissions of hazardous pollutants,” the judges wrote in a concurring opinion. “We conclude that the district court correctly held that Plaintiffs established standing for each of their claims and did not abuse its discretion in awarding a penalty of $19.95 million against Exxon to deter it from committing future violations.”
The Sierra Club and Environment Texas sued Exxon under a provision in the federal Clean Air Act that allows citizens to sue amid inaction by state and federal environmental regulators. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality rarely penalizes companies for unauthorized air emissions, a Texas Tribune investigation found.
“People in Baytown and Houston expect industry to be good neighbors,” Luke Metzger, executive director of Environment Texas, said in a statement. “But when companies violate the law and put health-threatening pollution into neighborhoods, they need to be held accountable.”
___
This story was originally published by The Texas Tribuneand distributed through a partnership with The Associated Press.
Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.
veryGood! (7126)
Related
- Nevada attorney general revives 2020 fake electors case
- Stranded motorist shot dead by trooper he shot after trooper stopped to help him, authorities say
- Elliot Page Details Secret, 2-Year Romance With Closeted Celeb
- Allow Kylie Jenner to Give You a Mini Tour of Her California Home
- 2025 'Doomsday Clock': This is how close we are to self
- Tips to help dogs during fireworks on the Fourth of July
- Alligator attacks and kills woman who was walking her dog in South Carolina
- Lady Gaga Will Give You a Million Reasons to Love Her Makeup-Free Selfies
- Rylee Arnold Shares a Long
- Texas teen who reportedly vanished 8 years ago while walking his dogs is found alive
Ranking
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- How Anthony Bourdain's Raw Honesty Made His Demons Part of His Appeal
- What's Next for Johnny Depp: Inside His Busy Return to the Spotlight
- Game-Winning Father's Day Gift Ideas for the Sports Fan Dad
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- United Airlines passengers affected by flight havoc to receive travel vouchers
- 3 dead, 8 wounded in shooting in Fort Worth, Texas parking lot
- Woman dead, 9 injured after fireworks explosion at home in Michigan
Recommendation
Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
How many Americans still haven't caught COVID-19? CDC publishes final 2022 estimates
Get $95 Worth of Peter Thomas Roth Skincare Masks for 50% Off
Former Australian Football League player becomes first female athlete to be diagnosed with CTE
Israel lets Palestinians go back to northern Gaza for first time in over a year as cease
Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's Son Prince Archie Receives Royally Sweet 4th Birthday Present
Annual Report Card Marks Another Disastrous Year for the Arctic
NASCAR contractor electrocuted to death while setting up course for Chicago Street Race